The Moon Landings
We of mankind have long gazed up at the beloved Moon in awe and wonder.
And as the story goes, between 1969 and 1972 NASA allegedly performed 6 successful manned missions to the surface of the Moon, and in doing so transformed human identity by finally 'proving' the heliocentric model to be true, once and for all.
Or did they?
This contemplation is powerful because I believe it's one of the easiest contemplations to bear witness to. My sense is that pretty much anyone willing to take the time to look at the evidence walks away believing NASA (et al) lied (are lying) about it all. So much simply doesn't add up or make sense. So much also seems obvious. At least this was my experience when I finally decided to look into it last year.
​
And yet, one must be willing not only to bear witness to the evidence, but also to process the implications that comes with it. Which is not for the faint of heart. To start pulling on the house of cards, risking all to tumble, is a journey to say the least.
​
Are you willing?
Are you ready?
If so... bravo.
And read on.
​
​
Bearing Faithful Witness...
To support your bearing witness is a Journey of Contemplation, which begins with my take on 20 Questions, followed by a curated collection of 10-links presented in an order. A Moon Landing Mix Tape of sorts... these links are highlights from the hundreds i've experienced as part of my own journeys bearing witness to this story. Here in this form as a way to share with you (et al).
My suggestion is to experience the links in three phases, with links 1-5 as the first grouping... link 6 on it's own… and then 7-10 to complete the journey. Strive, as well, to experience the grouping as closely together as possible, ideally within the same week. Given all the cultural imprinting, it takes a bit to crack through that facade so your common sense and intuition can have some space to do their thing.
​
Step by step, indeed.
Ready?
To venture in… finally… to see for yourself… once and for all?
Did NASA land men on the moon or not?​
​
As with the other contemplations…
if you choose to venture in…
I'd love to hear what you think on the other side.
+++
​
20 Questions...
​
-
How can a vacuum of space exist adjacent to this pressurized air we're breathing given the notion of entropy vis-a-vis the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?
-
At what point and by what process did the Apollo spacecrafts traveling at the alleged speeds in the upper atmosphere of over 17,000+ mph (Mach 23) transition out of this incredibly fast movement into the alleged non-moving vacuum of space?
-
How did the Apollo Missions safely pass through the supposed 'Van Allen Radiation Belt'?
-
How were the physical crafts able to survive the alleged temperatures in upper atmosphere / space environment (i.e. the Thermosphere and Exosphere) given that the temperatures here are said to exceed the melting temperatures of the materials used to make the crafts, e.g. aluminum, fiberglass, stainless steel?
-
Why did Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins appear to fake the first image of Earth through a window (and why did they look so incredibly dour at the first big press conference after having just accomplished what many consider the highest achievement to date for mankind)?
-
Why were there no burn craters created on the Moon's surface beneath any of the 10,000 lb lunar lander thrusters?
-
Why wasn't any Moondust on any of the landing gear of any of the missions?
-
How did the photography / video equipment and film survive the radiation?
-
How did the photography / video equipment and film survive the temperature ranges?
-
Why do shadow patterns on the Moon surface in the images indicate multiple, artificial light sources?
-
How is the moving flag possible during the times when no one was near it?
-
How did the astronauts communicate with Mission Control (and Nixon in the Whitehouse) so clearly and without the required time delay?
-
Why were there so few images of Earth taken from the Moon's surface?
-
Why weren't any videos of Earth taken from the Moon's surface?
-
Why weren't any images or videos of the stars taken from the Moon's surface?
-
Why do all the images of Earth from space / the Moon appear to be photoshopped?
-
Why wasn't the engine sound heard during the various Moon "blast-offs" from within the craft?
-
Why have astronauts said such completely different things about seeing the stars from space?
-
Are we really to believe that NASA destroyed the technology used to get to the Moon... taped over all the telemetry data... and lost all the original video footage?
-
Given the Inverse Square Law (1/r2, which says that as you move towards a point light source, the intensity of the light increases proportional to the inverse square of the distance) why was the surface of the Moon not unfathomably bright given the alleged distance away of 240,000 miles?
BONUS QUESTIONS
-
Why does there appear to be visible air bubbles, cables, harnesses, and CGI effects as part of the video footage associated with the ISS (International Space Station)?
-
Why hasn't any astronaut ever taken a 360º video during any time while in the alleged space... and why hasn't there ever been a video of an astronaut actually leaving the craft and entering space?
​
Journey of Contemplation (5:59:48)
​
BONUS LINKS
Current Conclusions...
​
-
NASA lied about all the Apollo Missions / landing astronauts on the Moon.
-
NASA is lying about the International Space Station (ISS).
-
NASA is lying about the Moon, as well as Space, the Sun, the planets, the stars.
-
More data is needed when it comes to what (how and why) the Moon actually is.
​
​
Implications...
​
-
NASA is an unreliable source of information.
-
Any Authority promoting the Moon Landings are not reliable.
-
Reality appears to be vastly different than what we've been told.​
​
​
Follow-up Questions...
​
-
If NASA (et al) is lying about the Moon... what else might they be lying about?
-
What are other explanations (options) of what the Moon actually is?
-
What to make of amateur astronomy, i.e. what is actually visible / being looked and how does this differ from what's being created digitally / CGI?
​
​
